<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PreFlight TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preflight.tv/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preflight.tv</link>
	<description>The show for pilots, and those who wish they were...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:42:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 9: Vendors at AirVenture by myT Studio Oshkosh 2011 Recap &#124; myTransponder</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2011/08/29/episode-9-vendors-at-airventure//comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>myT Studio Oshkosh 2011 Recap &#124; myTransponder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=796#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] http://preflight.tv/blog/2011/08/29/episode-9-vendors-at-airventure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://preflight.tv/blog/2011/08/29/episode-9-vendors-at-airventure" rel="nofollow">http://preflight.tv/blog/2011/08/29/episode-9-vendors-at-airventure</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 4: The iPad as a flight tool by 24&#215;7 Tech reports &#187; foreflight ipad 3</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/10/26/episode4-the-ipad-as-a-flight-tool//comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>24&#215;7 Tech reports &#187; foreflight ipad 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=393#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] Episode 4: The iPad as a flight tool &#124; PreFlight TV At steady cruise the AGPS in the iPad was vitually spot on with the other 2 GPS units. Source: Video on Foreflight blog page. The iPad was using foreflight app for iPad. 3&gt; If you look at the specs on the iPad the unit &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Episode 4: The iPad as a flight tool | PreFlight TV At steady cruise the AGPS in the iPad was vitually spot on with the other 2 GPS units. Source: Video on Foreflight blog page. The iPad was using foreflight app for iPad. 3&gt; If you look at the specs on the iPad the unit &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 8: Air Band Transceivers by Marc</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2011/04/19/episode-8-air-band-transceivers//comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=735#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I believe I ranted, &quot;turn around or descend.&quot;  I didn&#039;t intend to imply that descending is the only option.  It depends.  Very often VFR pilots get into IMC during a climb, or immediately after a climb.  In such a case, they should immediately descend (if clear of obstacles).  A better resource than me on &quot;Inadvertent IMC&quot; would be Patrick Shaub (AOPA).  He wrote an article that might be fodder for a good debate: http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/inst_reports2.cfm?article=6153

I completely agree with confessing the situation to ATC.  I think that too often, as pilots, we are unwilling to admit that we&#039;re over our heads.  A little help can go along way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe I ranted, &#8220;turn around or descend.&#8221;  I didn&#8217;t intend to imply that descending is the only option.  It depends.  Very often VFR pilots get into IMC during a climb, or immediately after a climb.  In such a case, they should immediately descend (if clear of obstacles).  A better resource than me on &#8220;Inadvertent IMC&#8221; would be Patrick Shaub (AOPA).  He wrote an article that might be fodder for a good debate: <a href="http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/inst_reports2.cfm?article=6153" rel="nofollow">http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/inst_reports2.cfm?article=6153</a></p>
<p>I completely agree with confessing the situation to ATC.  I think that too often, as pilots, we are unwilling to admit that we&#8217;re over our heads.  A little help can go along way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 8: Air Band Transceivers by joatnm</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2011/04/19/episode-8-air-band-transceivers//comment-page-1#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>joatnm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=735#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Well I think you have given a shining example of downside of ranting.  What I am referring to is the bad advice you spouted mid-rant.  If a private pilot without an instrument rating should find himself/herself in IMC inadvertantly the last thing they should do is descend!  Remember the 5 C&#039;s. (Climb, control, conserve, confess, comply)  First thing to do is Climb.  I agree that the portable VOR Tranceiver is not going to save you with partial panel and probably a bad idea as you suggest.  The thing you want to do is climb to a safe altitude, hopefully you know your rough position enough to be able to identify the grid altitude on your sectional.  Then once you have that you can safely follow the rest of the 5 C&#039;s and make your way out of the IMC and to safety.  Don&#039;t try to make it out yourself.  If you can call ATC, Confess your situation and ask for help.  In that situation don&#039;t descend.  Climb, use your head and figure the best way out of the IMC, depending on winds and conditions a 180 degree turn isn&#039;t always your best option.  So knowing the weather patterns before you go and geting inflight updates on the current conditions is always helpful.

I agree with your points about these radios and especially about the usefulness of a portable VOR tranceiver.  Either of these radios would serve most pilots well for many years.

I love the Preflight TV series and I look forward to many more episodes.  Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think you have given a shining example of downside of ranting.  What I am referring to is the bad advice you spouted mid-rant.  If a private pilot without an instrument rating should find himself/herself in IMC inadvertantly the last thing they should do is descend!  Remember the 5 C&#8217;s. (Climb, control, conserve, confess, comply)  First thing to do is Climb.  I agree that the portable VOR Tranceiver is not going to save you with partial panel and probably a bad idea as you suggest.  The thing you want to do is climb to a safe altitude, hopefully you know your rough position enough to be able to identify the grid altitude on your sectional.  Then once you have that you can safely follow the rest of the 5 C&#8217;s and make your way out of the IMC and to safety.  Don&#8217;t try to make it out yourself.  If you can call ATC, Confess your situation and ask for help.  In that situation don&#8217;t descend.  Climb, use your head and figure the best way out of the IMC, depending on winds and conditions a 180 degree turn isn&#8217;t always your best option.  So knowing the weather patterns before you go and geting inflight updates on the current conditions is always helpful.</p>
<p>I agree with your points about these radios and especially about the usefulness of a portable VOR tranceiver.  Either of these radios would serve most pilots well for many years.</p>
<p>I love the Preflight TV series and I look forward to many more episodes.  Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 4: The iPad as a flight tool by Marc</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/10/26/episode4-the-ipad-as-a-flight-tool//comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=393#comment-24</guid>
		<description>To be very clear:  we left out allot.  :)

PreFlight TV episodes are an introduction to the gizmo, idea, practice, or event, in the way that television news is to newspapers.  The episodes are really just a taste. 
 
For the record, I agree with everything you&#039;re saying.  

I too heard/read the blog story about iPad overheating above 10,000 feet, though I don&#039;t believe it.  In an unpressurized aircraft 10,000 feet is ~20F colder than the surface, and pressurized aircraft are pressurized to at least ~8,000 feet.  So, the reason doesn&#039;t make any sense to me.  My best guess is that Apple simply didn&#039;t test it for higher than 10,000 feet.  Why would they?  It probably didn&#039;t even cross their minds that general aviation pilots would want to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be very clear:  we left out allot.  <img src='http://preflight.tv/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>PreFlight TV episodes are an introduction to the gizmo, idea, practice, or event, in the way that television news is to newspapers.  The episodes are really just a taste. </p>
<p>For the record, I agree with everything you&#8217;re saying.  </p>
<p>I too heard/read the blog story about iPad overheating above 10,000 feet, though I don&#8217;t believe it.  In an unpressurized aircraft 10,000 feet is ~20F colder than the surface, and pressurized aircraft are pressurized to at least ~8,000 feet.  So, the reason doesn&#8217;t make any sense to me.  My best guess is that Apple simply didn&#8217;t test it for higher than 10,000 feet.  Why would they?  It probably didn&#8217;t even cross their minds that general aviation pilots would want to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 4: The iPad as a flight tool by joatnm</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/10/26/episode4-the-ipad-as-a-flight-tool//comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>joatnm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=393#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Just to be clear here are some things that you left out or were a bit off on.  That said this was a great piece and I agree that the iPad and hopefully Motorolla Xoom, etc. will revolutionize CRM.

1&gt; A person can use the Wifi only iPad for in flight use.  There are many compatible Bluetooth enabled GPS receivers that are much more accurate than the AGPS receiver that comes in the 3G enabled iPad units.  You can find much more accurate fix readings with a WAAS enabled Bluetooth GPS.

2&gt; This is important to note since it has been found that compared against a new handheld Garmin and a panel mounted G1000 GPS that the iPad GPS can be off as much as 14 NM.  This problem is most prevalent on climb out and descent to approach and landing.  The most critical phases of flight.  At steady cruise the AGPS in the iPad was vitually spot on with the other 2 GPS units.  Source: Video on Foreflight blog page.  The iPad was using foreflight app for iPad.

3&gt; If you look at the specs on the iPad the unit is only rated up to 10,000 feet MSL!  I have called Apple tech support about this.  I spoke with techs as well as their supervisors and none of them could tell me why this is.  Best answer I could find was a guess by a blogger who guessed that the limit was due to the iPad being succeptible to overheating due to thinner air at high altitudes.  And it is true that there have been reports with the first iPads overheating while sitting in cars or in direct sunlight when sitting in a window.  So fly high with the iPad at your own risk.  They will know if you were up to high since you had your GPS altimiter on.

Foreflight recently posted an article on their website listing their picks for GPS accessories, maps and apps to compliment Foreflight on iPad.  It is worth a look.

Nate - MT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear here are some things that you left out or were a bit off on.  That said this was a great piece and I agree that the iPad and hopefully Motorolla Xoom, etc. will revolutionize CRM.</p>
<p>1&gt; A person can use the Wifi only iPad for in flight use.  There are many compatible Bluetooth enabled GPS receivers that are much more accurate than the AGPS receiver that comes in the 3G enabled iPad units.  You can find much more accurate fix readings with a WAAS enabled Bluetooth GPS.</p>
<p>2&gt; This is important to note since it has been found that compared against a new handheld Garmin and a panel mounted G1000 GPS that the iPad GPS can be off as much as 14 NM.  This problem is most prevalent on climb out and descent to approach and landing.  The most critical phases of flight.  At steady cruise the AGPS in the iPad was vitually spot on with the other 2 GPS units.  Source: Video on Foreflight blog page.  The iPad was using foreflight app for iPad.</p>
<p>3&gt; If you look at the specs on the iPad the unit is only rated up to 10,000 feet MSL!  I have called Apple tech support about this.  I spoke with techs as well as their supervisors and none of them could tell me why this is.  Best answer I could find was a guess by a blogger who guessed that the limit was due to the iPad being succeptible to overheating due to thinner air at high altitudes.  And it is true that there have been reports with the first iPads overheating while sitting in cars or in direct sunlight when sitting in a window.  So fly high with the iPad at your own risk.  They will know if you were up to high since you had your GPS altimiter on.</p>
<p>Foreflight recently posted an article on their website listing their picks for GPS accessories, maps and apps to compliment Foreflight on iPad.  It is worth a look.</p>
<p>Nate &#8211; MT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Electronic Pilot Logbooks (preview of episode 6) by Marc</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/12/28/electronic_logbooks//comment-page-1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=545#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Not sure how I missed the flight review info.  Must have been a typo, as it is pretty obvious.  :) 

As for the &quot;Practical FAA Requirements&quot;, does the report display what&#039;s left to achieve a private pilot certificate?  Safelog is the only software I found that does this.  All other software report on past flights, but not report on remaining flights.  If Zululog reports on future requirements then I&#039;ll certainly make the correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how I missed the flight review info.  Must have been a typo, as it is pretty obvious.  <img src='http://preflight.tv/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>As for the &#8220;Practical FAA Requirements&#8221;, does the report display what&#8217;s left to achieve a private pilot certificate?  Safelog is the only software I found that does this.  All other software report on past flights, but not report on remaining flights.  If Zululog reports on future requirements then I&#8217;ll certainly make the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Electronic Pilot Logbooks (preview of episode 6) by kellybonner</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/12/28/electronic_logbooks//comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>kellybonner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 01:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=545#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Marc,

Thanks for the reviews!

I just wanted to point out that ZuluLog.com does indeed include support for both flight reviews and practical FAA requirements, as well as free exports.

Flight review support is included in the free EX version, and conforms to FAA requirements about when a flight review is due. Flight reviews are entered via the regular flight entry screen, and status can be checked via the Pilot Currency screen.

Practical FAA requirements are included in the Platinum version via the advanced filters and the &quot;Form 8710 Totals&quot; screen on the Currency/Certificates menu.

For the export feature, only the XML export is limited to Platinum customers. The CSV/spreadsheet export is free. 

Thanks again,

Kelly Bonner
Vice President, Customer Relations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,</p>
<p>Thanks for the reviews!</p>
<p>I just wanted to point out that ZuluLog.com does indeed include support for both flight reviews and practical FAA requirements, as well as free exports.</p>
<p>Flight review support is included in the free EX version, and conforms to FAA requirements about when a flight review is due. Flight reviews are entered via the regular flight entry screen, and status can be checked via the Pilot Currency screen.</p>
<p>Practical FAA requirements are included in the Platinum version via the advanced filters and the &#8220;Form 8710 Totals&#8221; screen on the Currency/Certificates menu.</p>
<p>For the export feature, only the XML export is limited to Platinum customers. The CSV/spreadsheet export is free. </p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>Kelly Bonner<br />
Vice President, Customer Relations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 5: Scotch Break with Amy and Marc by Marc</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/11/23/episode-5-scotch-break-with-amy-and-marc//comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=520#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Nope.  She&#039;s been in Argentina, on vacation (staying in hostels) for the last month.

Don&#039;t worry, we&#039;re planning on the filming her flying, when we go.

Actually, I&#039;m thinking that I well get an instructor to give her a lesson.  I mean, the whole reason for having a non-pilot as a co-host is to ask the questions us enthusiasts take for granted.  So, seeing Amy take the controls for the first time might help someone who knows very little about aviation gain the confidence to try it themselves.  After all, as pilots it&#039;s no big deal to say, &quot;just find a flight school/instructor and go&quot;, but to someone who is totally out of the loop this is a huge hurdle.

Now... shhhhhh... Don&#039;t tell Amy.  I haven&#039;t said anything to her yet.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  She&#8217;s been in Argentina, on vacation (staying in hostels) for the last month.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, we&#8217;re planning on the filming her flying, when we go.</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;m thinking that I well get an instructor to give her a lesson.  I mean, the whole reason for having a non-pilot as a co-host is to ask the questions us enthusiasts take for granted.  So, seeing Amy take the controls for the first time might help someone who knows very little about aviation gain the confidence to try it themselves.  After all, as pilots it&#8217;s no big deal to say, &#8220;just find a flight school/instructor and go&#8221;, but to someone who is totally out of the loop this is a huge hurdle.</p>
<p>Now&#8230; shhhhhh&#8230; Don&#8217;t tell Amy.  I haven&#8217;t said anything to her yet.  <img src='http://preflight.tv/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 5: Scotch Break with Amy and Marc by cholubaz</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/11/23/episode-5-scotch-break-with-amy-and-marc//comment-page-1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>cholubaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=520#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Did you get her up in the plane yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you get her up in the plane yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Electronic Pilot Logbooks (preview of episode 6) by Marc</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/12/28/electronic_logbooks//comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=545#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hmm... I had to figure out why I didn&#039;t put a &#039;Y&#039; in that field, but upon review you&#039;re right.  

The reason I missed it is because only the certificate to expire NEXT shows up in the &#039;flights&#039; window.  So, in my case I see that my medical is going to expire in 57 days, but I don&#039;t see when my biannual review will be required.  This looked to me like only the medical was being reported.

Anyway, I added the &#039;Y&#039; to the field.  Thanks.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I had to figure out why I didn&#8217;t put a &#8216;Y&#8217; in that field, but upon review you&#8217;re right.  </p>
<p>The reason I missed it is because only the certificate to expire NEXT shows up in the &#8216;flights&#8217; window.  So, in my case I see that my medical is going to expire in 57 days, but I don&#8217;t see when my biannual review will be required.  This looked to me like only the medical was being reported.</p>
<p>Anyway, I added the &#8216;Y&#8217; to the field.  Thanks.  <img src='http://preflight.tv/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Electronic Pilot Logbooks (preview of episode 6) by coradine</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/12/28/electronic_logbooks//comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>coradine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=545#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Marc,

Great review by the way! We are looking forward to the detailed episode! 

Since I represent Coradine Aviation Systems, I just wanted to point out that we do in fact show when a Flight Review is due for you. When you track your certificates, BFRs and medicals in LogTen Pro, we do alert you for your next expiring certificate record right on the Flights page (or Radar for mobile devices). Future versions will have more advanced notifications as well.

And while we do not have a predetermined list of Practical FAA Requirements, we do have the Smart Group system which is customizable to track nearly any field. So it could easily track that you are meeting requirements towards any FAA (or other agency for that matter) practical exam.

Looking forward to the detailed episode!
Cheers, 
Torea Rodriguez
Director of Customer Relations
Coradine Aviation Systems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,</p>
<p>Great review by the way! We are looking forward to the detailed episode! </p>
<p>Since I represent Coradine Aviation Systems, I just wanted to point out that we do in fact show when a Flight Review is due for you. When you track your certificates, BFRs and medicals in LogTen Pro, we do alert you for your next expiring certificate record right on the Flights page (or Radar for mobile devices). Future versions will have more advanced notifications as well.</p>
<p>And while we do not have a predetermined list of Practical FAA Requirements, we do have the Smart Group system which is customizable to track nearly any field. So it could easily track that you are meeting requirements towards any FAA (or other agency for that matter) practical exam.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the detailed episode!<br />
Cheers,<br />
Torea Rodriguez<br />
Director of Customer Relations<br />
Coradine Aviation Systems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Small changes afoot&#8230; by Marc</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/09/17/small-changes-afoot//comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 03:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=331#comment-13</guid>
		<description>As a part of the &quot;small changes&quot; I also added an &quot;Aviation Search&quot; page (http://preflight.tv/search).  It&#039;s a google search, but it&#039;s scoped to only a few aviation related sites.  Let me know if you find it useful, or would like me to include more sites in the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a part of the &#8220;small changes&#8221; I also added an &#8220;Aviation Search&#8221; page (<a href="http://preflight.tv/search" rel="nofollow">http://preflight.tv/search</a>).  It&#8217;s a google search, but it&#8217;s scoped to only a few aviation related sites.  Let me know if you find it useful, or would like me to include more sites in the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Small changes afoot&#8230; by Marc</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/09/17/small-changes-afoot//comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 00:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=331#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Since nobody complained, I performed the same kind of redirection with the medium size files, though they are redirected back to this site.  The purpose behind this latest change is help with metrics, and to keep things consistent.  Again, if anyone finds that they are having problems, let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since nobody complained, I performed the same kind of redirection with the medium size files, though they are redirected back to this site.  The purpose behind this latest change is help with metrics, and to keep things consistent.  Again, if anyone finds that they are having problems, let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Stores by helkac3</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/aviation-links/stores/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>helkac3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?page_id=26#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I would also like to recommend a great &lt;a&gt;pilot shop&lt;/a&gt; to the directory.  They process orders quickly and have great prices on &lt;a&gt;pilot supplies&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a&gt;aviation headsets&lt;/a&gt;.  The company is called &lt;a&gt;Pilot&#039;s HQ&lt;/a&gt; and is located at http://pilotshq.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also like to recommend a great <a>pilot shop</a> to the directory.  They process orders quickly and have great prices on <a>pilot supplies</a> and <a>aviation headsets</a>.  The company is called <a>Pilot&#8217;s HQ</a> and is located at <a href="http://pilotshq.com" rel="nofollow">http://pilotshq.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 2: Headphones by bose headphones breaking &#124; Audio Headphones</title>
		<link>http://preflight.tv/blog/2010/07/11/episode-2-headphones//comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>bose headphones breaking &#124; Audio Headphones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 05:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preflight.tv/?p=280#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] Episode #2 &#8211; Headphones &#124; PreFlight TV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Episode #2 &#8211; Headphones | PreFlight TV [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

